Skip to main content

Partnerships

 

Desk Team LawDocs

Partnerships in India are govern by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The Act defines partnership as ‘The relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all’. The Act while laying down the provisions with respect to rights and duties of the partners also details the consequences of retirement of a partner and dissolution of a partnership firm.

Contents  hide 

1 Guru Nanak Industries, Faridabad and Another v/s Amar Singh (Dead) through Legal Representatives

1.1 Guru Nanak Industries

1.2 Supreme Court dismissed the appellants

1.2.1 The Supreme Court relied on the judgement

2 Reference

2.1 Related

Guru Nanak Industries, Faridabad and Another v/s Amar Singh (Dead) through Legal Representatives

Partnerships

While distinguishing between the retirement of a partner and the breakup of a partner company, the Supreme Court held that the retirement of one partner would amount to the dissolution of the company if there were only two partners in a partner company.

The dispute arose in the case of Guru Nanak Industries, Faridabad and Another v/s Amar Singh (Dead) through Legal Representatives[1]A partnership firm found between four individuals in 1978, i.e. The second appellant herein, Amar Singh and two other partners, is Swaran Singh. Swaran Singh and Amar Singh executed a new partnership deed between themselves in 1981 upon the departure of the other two partners.

Guru Nanak Industries

Guru Nanak Industries and Swaran Singh filed a lawsuit against Amar Singh in 1989 alleging that Amar Singh had withdrawn from the partnership effective August 24, 1988 and accepted his capital payment on a voluntary basis. Furthermore, the appellants argued that Amar Singh had granted a loan from the partnership funds and had thus decided that he would not be entitle to the company’s income or liabilities.

The key point put forward by the appellants was that, because Amar Singh had resigned as a partner, he was only entitled to the capital kept in his loan in the book of accounts under the terms of the partnership deed clause. The argument was challenged by Amar Singh, claiming that he had never left the company.

Furthermore, with respect to the dissolution of the company, the receipt claim that this sum obtain by Amar Singh and the last line stating his total amount is resolve and nothing is owe to him from the appellants was forge. Amar Singh has lodged a complaint against the company’s partition and rendition of accounts.

Supreme Court dismissed the appellants

Partnerships

Noting the manipulations in the letter and receipt, the Supreme Court dismiss the appellants’ argument and that in this case there were only two partners, and the facts on record support the respondent’s assertion that it had not withdraw from the company. The Supreme Court further held that in order to dissolve the company. There was common understanding and consent between the parties.

When denying the appeal, the Supreme Court made a strong distinction between ‘a partner’s retirement’ and ‘a partnership firm’s breakup.’ The Supreme Court rule that the reconstituted firm must begin after the retirement of a partner and that his dues would paid to the retired partner in compliance with Section 37 of the Act. In the event of a partnership firm’s breakup, the accounts will have to be resolved and allocated in compliance with Section 48 of the Act.

The Supreme Court relied on the judgement

Partnerships

In the case of Pamuru Vishnu Vinodh Reddy v. Chillakuru Chandrasekhara Reddy and others[2], the Supreme Court relied on the judgement made. It explained that it is a case of separation and not retirement when the partners agree to dissolve a relationship. Since the partnership had only two partners in the present case, the Supreme Court held that the partnership firm could not continue to carry on the company’s business after the retirement of a single partner.

The Court reiterated that there must be two partners in a partnership company. It emphasised on Erach F.D. Mehta v. Minoo F.D. Mehta[3], in which it was held that the withdrawal would amount to the breakup of the company if there were only two partners in a company and one had decided to retire.

The Supreme Court has therefore reiterated the position. That there must be more than one partner for a partnership to succeed. Even the concept of partnership notes that a ‘relationship between individuals’. Means that two or more individuals must be part of a partnership.

Therefore, as in the present case , the company would immediately dissolve in the case of a partnership firm. Consisting of two individuals on the retirement of one partner and the provisions. For the dissolution of the partnership under the Act will apply.

Reference

Partnerships


[1] Civil Appeal Nos. 6659-6660 of 2010.

[2] Pamuru Vishnu Vinodh Reddy v. Chillakuru Chandrasekhara Reddy and others, (2003) 3 SCC 445.

[3] Erach F.D. Mehta v. Minoo F.D. Mehta, (1970) 2 SCC 724.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Registration of LLP and Laws

  Name – Shweta Pandit College - National Law School Of India University, Bangalore. Introduction- LLP(Limited Liability Partnership) is a limited liability company, you will find the characteristics of both a corporation and a partnership in this form of a company. LLP came into effect in 2008 when the Limited Liability Partnership Act was passed in India..  LLP- Limited Liability Partnership, is a partnership where partners have limited liability and are responsible only for the loss/damage created by themselves and not by any of their partner or partners. Partners in LLP have a fair share of say in the workings of the business.  Registration of LLP- It is a long process to register a LLP, the few steps involved in the process are discussed as follows: First step is to get the DSC, which is a Digital Signature Certificate from the government agencies such as E-Mudra, NSDL, IDRBT Certifying Authority, National Informatics Center, CDAC and each agency has its own costs of providing ser

Attestation , Revocation, Alteration and Revival of Wills

  Author: Amit Sheoran, Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur People were worried about their lives after the corona pandemic. Because in Corona, no one was aware that anything could happen at any time. That is why they start thinking that if they die, then what will happen with their property and, as a result, they start making plans. A question arises in our mind after hearing the word will. What is will? It is defined under 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. A will is a testamentary document by which a person bequeaths his property in the name of any other person. It will be effective after the death of the testator. The property will devolve on the person in whose favour it is bequeathed after the death of the testator. A will can be changed, revoked, or altered at any point of time after it is made. A will can be written more than once.All wills are revocable at any time during the life of the person and are confidential documents. A will can be attested, revoked, altered, and also r

Indian Depository Receipts: Requisites and Benefits

  Yash Miniyar Maharashtra National Law University, Aurangabad A. INTRODUCTION Depository Receipts are a form of transferable instruments, which aid in the flow of general trade in a stock exchange at a given time. They are classified as financial securities in the form of equity that are issued by listed companies. The depository receipt is a form of certificate which denotes the valid holding of the security or shares of a given company. One of the most recognised and busiest forms of depository receipts in the world is the American Depository Receipts, which allows in trading of shares or securities of foreign companies. These receipts act as a form of investment for potential investors in order to diversify their assets and hold shares of their desired companies. This not only allows the economic diversification but also the geographic diversification. These depositories act as mediums to curb the hindrances or the obstacles which prevented people from making foreign investments,